• Home
  • 

    PREVIOUS POST

    Friday 22 November 2019, 11:55 am

    JACC Journals’ Operating Policies effective:decisions regarding the Journal editors

    JACC Journals’ Operating Policies effective:decisions regarding the Journal editors

    We. FOR EDITORS

    The Journals of this American College of Cardiology would be the formal peer-reviewed magazines for the United states College of Cardiology (ACC). The choices regarding the Journal editors and their particular boards are built in addition to the ACC, its publishing partner, or interests that are commercial. The ACC Publication & Education Coordination Committee, which states in to the ACC Board of Trustee while the ACC Compensation Committee, maintains oversight the Journals, and it has approved these working policies, that are proposed because of the JACC Journals Editors in Chief. The JACC Journals Editors in Chief have the effect of the selection and handling of their boards that are respective.

    A. Relationships with Industry

    The Editors-in-Chief, Executive Editors, Deputy Editors and Associate Editors must reveal any relevant relationships with industry (RWI) or potential disputes, and update those RWI on a basis that is annual the ACC database.

    Then he or she is not permitted to provide compensated editorial services for another cardiovascular or CV subspecialty journal, unless he or she obtain a waiver from the Editor-in-Chief and the ACC Board of Trustees if a member of the JACC journals’ Editorial Board receives compensation for serving on the Board. a template page for waivers can be acquired upon demand through the ACC Publishing Director.

    B. Guest Editors

    Guest Editors’ editorial decisions are required to be produced without having any impact because of the internal JACC panels. JACC journals’ papers are positioned when you look at the Guest Editor procedure if:

    • The paper contains an writer whom functions as an Editor-in-Chief, Deputy/Executive, or Associate Editor on that board.
    • The paper contains a writer through the institution that is editor-in-Chief’s
    • An author is contained by the paper from an organization wherein almost all of Associate Editors practice/work.
    • An author is contained by the paper that is a JACC journals’ Editor-in-Chief

    If needed, these documents additionally needs to go through a analytical review by a Guest Statistical Editor.

    C. Plagiarism

    In cases where a editor or reviewer raises a problem about plagiarism, that person should really be informed that the Journal editors will perform a study. The paper will go through an evaluation utilizing the CrossCheck software, followed closely by or combined with an editor’s comparative review. After those actions, the paper is brought for conversation into the editorial board for a opinion choice topics for proposal argument essay.

    If clear plagiarism is identified (in other words., perhaps not paraphrasing/copying of quick expressions only without attribution or redundancy, wherein there was copying through the author’s very own work), wherein there clearly was unattributed utilization of large portions of text and/or information, presented as though these people were by the author, the initial step is always to contact the writer. (The editors additionally might want to contact the writer if small copying is identified in basic terms/expressing frustration and describing the Journal’s position to inquire about writer to rephrase copied phrases or consist of as direct quotations with recommendations.)

    Whenever calling the matching writer in writing, the JACC editors should enclose a finalized authorship declaration (or resume cover letter) saying that the presented work is original/the author’s own, also documentary proof of plagiarism. With regards to the author’s response or absence thereof, the editors can see whether or perhaps not to contact the co-authors or formally contact the author’s institution that is corresponding. In the event that choice is always to contact corresponding author’s institution, the JACC journals’ ethics committee must certanly be informed, if you don’t just before that choice.

    D. Corrections & Retractions

    Four kinds of modifications are posted for significant mistakes of this JACC journals in the discernment associated with editors.

    • Erratum. Notification of a error that is important by the log, frequently pertaining to the information, which impacts the book record or the systematic integrity of this paper, or even the trustworthiness of the writers, or associated with the Journal. The author that is corresponding be notified if any erratum had been become given, without his/her initial participation. Errata will likely to be updated having a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.
    • Corrigendum. Notification of a error that is important by the author(s), frequently pertaining to the info, which impacts the book record or perhaps the clinical integrity associated with the paper, or even the standing of the authors or the Journal. The author that is corresponding be notified if any corrigenda had been become released, without his/her initial participation. In instances where coauthors disagree, the editors will determine whether a review that is additional necessary because of the editorial board or by a completely independent peer reviewer to impose the right amendment, noting the dissenting author(s) when you look at the text for the posted variation. Corrigenda is going to be updated by having a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.
    • Modification. On line modifications occur with information that will not influence the book record or perhaps the systematic integrity associated with paper, or the standing of the writers or perhaps the log. The matching writer will be notified if any erratum had been become given, without his/her initial involvement. Typically, modifications are made online as soon as the writers have actually submitted title or organization inaccurately. On line modifications should be updated on JACC.org and Science Direct, but will never be updated on PubMed.
    • Retraction. Book of invalid outcomes or circumstances when the Editor determines that that the paper calls for a retraction that is formal the record. Nonetheless, the Editor will inform ACC leadership/General Counsel early within the retraction consideration procedure. The Editor should determine whether or not the manuscript removes discoverable by the general public, or if the retraction notice should stay with its destination. The author that is corresponding be notified if any retraction had been become released, without his/her initial participation. In instances where coauthors disagree, the editors will determine whether a review that is additional necessary because of the editorial board or by an unbiased peer reviewer to impose the correct amendment, noting the dissenting author(s) when you look at the text of this posted variation. Retractions are going to be updated having a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.

    (Adapted from Nature & Elsevier policies)

    E. Preprint Server Policy

    Public dissemination of manuscripts ahead of, simultaneous with, or after submission to this log, such as for instance publishing the manuscript on preprint servers or other repositories, is frustrated. We ask that writers disclose this given information throughout the distribution procedure, because the JACC Journals will likely not accept submissions which have formerly published on a preprint host.

    F. Statistical Reviews

    JACC journals’ original research documents ( maybe not review articles) are generally delivered for analytical review after having a paper is provisionally accepted. Nonetheless, if an editor thinks that a analytical review is essential to see whether the paper ought to be accepted, the statistician must certanly be invited as being a reviewer from the paper. The scope associated with the review that is statistical be linked to the methodological application and results, not always the medical findings of this research.

    G. Social Media Marketing

    The JACC journals staff keeps 2 social media marketing platforms: JACC Journals Twitter web page in addition to @JACCjournals Twitter web page. Content is established by the JACC social media marketing editors, that are editorial board people rather than ACC staff, to make certain medical and medical precision. The tips for social media marketing, plus the JACC Journals recommendations. The ACC staff articles the information and manages the platforms. The United states healthcare Association (AMA) maxims of medical ethics act as a guide for article marketing and circulation in the JACC social media marketing platforms.

    No Response to “JACC Journals’ Operating Policies effective:decisions regarding the Journal editors”

    No comments yet.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.